About Me

Name:GenXDad
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Palin Surfaces as Possible VP Candidate

The Weekly Standard throws Alaska's governor Sarah Palin in the hat as a possible Veep.  All that blog buzz is paying off.

"On the other hand (as blogger of the year Ace of Spades points out), how can you not like the idea of a Vice President who looks comfortable bagging a deer?"
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (8) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Next Three Months: McCain's Biggest Opportunity

John McCain is now the nominee-apparent.  The Democrats, meanwhile, are locked in a knock-down drag-out fight that might not be settled before the convention.

Good time for McCain to go on vacation, right?  Lay low, raise some money, let the Dems tear themselves to shreds while he stands above the fray, right?  WRONG!

The next three months, from now until June, represent the most critical period of time for McCain's candidacy.  I believe his presidency will be effectively won or lost by June.  He'll either establish himself as a formidable candidate with energy and momentum behind him, or as the struggling underdog falling further behind, struggling against the poilitical tide.

Three months in politics is a lifetime, and McCain will need every minute of it.  Three months ago, McCain's political career was given up for dead, but he was laying the groundwork for his resurrection.  In those three months, he catapulted from also-ran to nominee.  It's one of the greatest political comebacks of all time, and it was accomplished against the backdrop of a hostile environment - conservative animosity, media indifference (at first), and being outspent and out-organized by three other candidates (Romney, Giuliani, and Fred Thompson).  McCain did everything he needed to do to win, despite long odds against him, and now he's the GOP nominee.

He begins this next stretch in much better shape than he was in last November.  He has the GOP nomination wrapped up, while the Democrats are locked in a bitter struggle.  His numbers show him consistently ahead of Clinton and in a dead heat with Obama.  But he also faces big challenges.  Much of the Republican party base, which he will need not only for votes but volunteers and contributions, is somewhere between skeptical and downright hostile.  The political mood in the country strongly favors the Democrats, and President Bush remains very unpopular (although his numbers are starting to go up a bit).

So McCain is at a crossroads.  He can establish himself as a dominant front-runner and force the Democrats to play catch-up, or he can squander this opportunity and find himself playing catch-up with the political tide running against him.

He needs to do three things:  Win over his base, establish a successful fundraising and political orgnaization, and set the tone for the Presidental debate to come in the fall.

Of the three, winning over the base is first and foremost.  There's little he can do, or needs to do, about Ann Coulter.  Forget her, she's only raising money for herself.  But he needs to talk directly to the rank-and file volunteers and donors who represent the backbone of the GOP.  His speech at CPAC was a great first start, but he needs to continue to talk directly with (not at) conservatives.  He needs to do this personally, not through surrogates or the media, and he needs to show that he's listening to the base.  If he can convince rank-and-file conservatives that he is 1) completely committed to winning the war on terror; 2) completely committed to appointing pro-life, conservative judges; 3) completely comitted to making the tax cuts permanent and lowering taxes; 4) will be unwavering in his support of Second Ammendment rights; and 5) will respect and support the positions conservatives hold dear, he will accomplish this task.  Reasonable conservatives will not throw away the country's future, concede defeat in the war on terror, or accept the demise of millions more of the unborn if they think McCain is serious and committed to doing right on these issues. 

And winning over the base will go a long way toward a successful fundraising and political organization.  McCain must tap into Bush's, Giuliani's and Romney's donors and start amassing a war chest, which he'll need in the summer for the "pre-convention campaign."    More importantly, he'll need this machinery set up in the fall. I'm not delusional, McCain won't be able to outraise and outspend the Democrats, but he won't need to.  He needs to be able to attack and counterattack, however, and not allow the Democrats to define him and the campaign.

Which brings us to the third task, setting the agenda for the campaign.  McCain has a huge advantage over all candidates, even the Democrats - he has the ear of the media.  With a solid base of support and a solid fundraising and political organization, plus his ability to reach people through the media, McCain can set the tone for the election, and he would need to do this in the summer.  If he's on the offensive, talking about issues where the Republicans have an advantage, he can turn the nature of the debate from a referendum on Bush to a discussion about what kind of nation and world we really want.  If the Democrats have to spend their time defending their foreign policy positions, or their tax hike proposals, or their socialized health care plans, instead of tying every Republican to Bush, it's a very different campaign.  And if this election becomes a choice between McCain's "straight talk" and Hillary's double-talk, the Democrats will find the tide running AGAINST them.

I would add that I believe, while McCain can work on these simultaneously, the most successful strategy would be to focus most of his efforts on accomplishing these tasks in order.  He's going to need the base to get the money and volunteers, and he's going to need that organization to get out his message to set the tone of the debate.  Going out of order here won't work.

So far, he's making a good start at accomplishing goal #1.  Stay tuned.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Turning to the Democrats

Now that Romney has dropped out, we can focus our energy on the real enemy, the Democrats.

An interesting phenomenon is going on in the Democratic race.  After Edwards dropped out, most of his support went to the surging Obama, who overtook Clinton in the national polls on the eve of Super Tuesday.  After pulling out a "tie," Clinton has opened up a lead on Obama. (No doubt this is due to Ann Coulter's big endorsement, right?)

I have a theory on this, which I'd call the "California Effect."   Obama won more states and more delegates, but Clinton won the big prize of California, so she was the effective winner.  Similarly, McCain's lead in the national polls was reflected in his 8-point win in the Golden State.  So goes California, so goes the nation, at least in primary politics, and perhaps vice-versa.

So while Clinton probably lost "Super Tuesday" by most statistical measures, she won the perception battle, which is reflected in her current surge in momentum, and that perception battle is because of California.  On the GOP side, McCain became the dominant winner primarily because he won so big in the Golden State.  Finally, California has some clout!  Apparently, it has a LOT of clout.  In fact, I'd go so far as to say California will choose both nominees.  (One could argue, and it's probably true, that Florida decided the GOP race and California settled the deal, but at any rate it played a HUGE and decisive role.)

It's interesting to note the number of pundits who have jumped on the Obama bandwagon, including a lot of GOP pundits.  Those who watch the races closely, such as Dick Morris, put their money on Clinton, and for good reason.  She has the built-in advantages of the "Clinton Machine" and the female vote.  She will absolutely win the "super delegate" battle.  And, thanks to California, she now has the momentum.

I see three scenarios.  Scenario one, the Democratic race goes virtually neck-and-neck all the way to the convention, but with an ever-so-slight edge to Clinton.  She'll go into the convention with a slight lead in delegates, bot not a majority.  The "superdelegates" put her over the top, and she's a significantly weakened nominee.  For Republicans, this is a "best case scenario."  I'd add it's also the most likely one.  40% chance this happens.

Scenario two, the Clinton Slime Machine pulls out  some dirt on Obama and it sticks.  Who knows, maybe the Republicans, concerned with the prospect of facing Obama, will offer an assist.  If there's something out there, I can't imagine the Clintons not using it, and it would come out soon.  In this scenario, Obama drops off and Clinton wins a comfortable majority of the delegates long before the convention, giving her plenty of time to mend fences within the Democratic Party.  I'd say this is the second most likely scenario.  35% chance of happening.

Secnario three, Clinton screws up.  Either an attempt to slime Obama backfires, she pulls one too many crying episodes, Bill sticks his foot in his mouth one too many times, or a new Clinton scandal emerges and Obama decides to bring it out in the primary.  (I would say there's a 90% chance of a Clinton scandal, or seven, coming out during the general election cycle.)  In this case, Clinton supporters reject her and go to Obama, who comes out with just enough delegates to get a majority before the convention and he's the nominee.  This could happen, and the odds of it happening are significant, but the odds are better than even that it won't.  25% chance, by my estimation.

So right now, the odds are good (probably 75%) for a Clinton nomination, which should go far towards unifying the Republican Party, even if McCain has trouble mending fences.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Robo-Calls from Romney

Who else but the Stepford Candidate would be sending out robo-calls?

We got two last night.  Almost woke up the baby, which was enough right there to make we want to see him lose big.  One of them was his "vote for me" message.  The other was a woman's voice trashing McCain. 

I hate these kind of negative calls - sneaky, slick, deceitful.  Somehow they figured out how to leave a message that couldn't be screened by the machine, so you can't listen to it while it's being delivered, you have to play it back.  It came in from a wireless line.  Lots of BS about how McCain and Hillary get along, Santorum's screed against McCain.  Very deceitful, sneaky and annoying.  I'm sure some Republicans will be receptive, especially the racist ones who call McCain "Juan, but as for me, it's just further proof that Romney is nothing but a slick, pandering little phoney with little positive to offer the nation.

If he somehow get the nomination, and I can't imagine that happening - notice NONE of the other Republican candidates have endorsed him - Romney would lose a la Walter Mondale.  We'd be left with an untrustworthy talk radio class and the conservative movement would be blamed, however unfairly, for the defeat, even though the truth is Romney isn't a conservative and he'd lose because he stinks as a candidate IN SPITE of his conservatism. 

With McCain, the conservatives can always say "he's not ours" if he implodes, and if he wins, they can say "oh, he's really a conservative," so they save face either way.  With Romney, he'll never win, because he's just  an unlikable candidate, the GOP, and especially the conservative movement, is headed to disaster.  Not to mention the country, which will be stuck with one of the two Democrats for four years.

And conservatives are rallying behind Romney, WHY???  (Oh yah, to keep their power for nine months.  Brilliant!)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Just Voted in California

I walked with my wife and our six-month-old son to our polling place in the Hollywood Riviera.  Not a lot of crowds.  The people who did show up were mostly nonpartisan and they had nowhere to go but with the Democrats.

It's a catch-22, but I believe we should allow independents to vote on the California Republican primary, which is what the voters wanted.  There's little likelihood that these voters will come back to the GOP if they've already voted for the Democrats in the primary.  The California Republican Party desperately needs to reach out to the large number of unaffiliated voters if we're ever going to have a chance of making this state competitive.

One reason I'm optimistic about McCain is he can sell the Republican message to the independents, and the'll listen to him.  The Land of Reagan has become a desert wasteland for conservatism over the past twenty years.  We need something to regrow the Republican Party and bring back the independents.  It sure as heck won't be Romney.

In case you're wondering how I voted:

John McCain - President
No on ALL CA props
Yes on Redondo Beach Measure C (School Bonds)

As an aside, our neighborhood suffered a blackout at the beginning of the fourth quarter of the Super Bowl on Sunday, so we missed the greatest quarter in Super Bowl history - ARRRRRGH!  On the plus side, my wife, my old son and I played "20 questions" in the candlelight, which was probably a better family bonding experience, so maybe the good lord had a good reason for depriving us of the Super Bowl.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Fox News: McCain Crushing Romney, Beating Hillary

The latest Fox News Poll shows McCain crushing the GOP field 48-20-19 (McCain/ Romney/ Huckabee), and leading HIllary.  Without Huckabee, McCain's number swells to 62%, which blows apart that theory that Huckabee is taking votes away from Romney - he's taking votes away from McCain!

This was a theory postulated by Michael Medved today, that the Huckabee voters, being evangelical and having serious qualms with Romney, both because of his background and his attacks on Huck, would be more inclined to either sit the election out or vote for McCain.  This poll shows they're McCain voters.

McCain's RCP average is now 11.8%, with the two latest polls indicating a possible landslide.

On the states, McCain now officially leads in Missouri, making Hugh Hewitt's "worst-case scenario for Mitt" a "most likely scenario," with the potential (if these Gallup and Fox polls are the least bit accurate) to be an even bigger night for McCain.  In the most recent state polls, McCain is leading everywhere. I haven't seen polls for Massachusetts and Utah (I'd imagine Romney is leading there), nor Arkansas (I'm very curious about this one.  I'm not at all convinced it's in the bag for Huckabee.)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ron Paul Could Win Maine??

Wow, Ron Paul might win the Maine Caucus this weekend.  Obviously, he has no chance of being much of a factor in the nomination proecess, but he seems to generate a surprising amount of energy and funds. 

Love him or hate him, Ron Paul ha brought a lot of new voters to the Republican Party who otherwise might go to the Democrats or stay home in November.  He's made it clear that he will support the Republican nominee and believes in party loyalty, despite being out-of-step on some big issues.

So the question is, how to we keep his supporters (and his fundraising, which is truly impressive) in the "big tent" for the general election?  Whether or not you take Ron Paul seriously, this is a question serious Republicans need to ask.  Three percent of the vote could be the margin of victory, so we need every one of these votes come November.  We need to be thinking about this now. 

Perhaps the first step is to stop personally insulting his supporters?  Just a thought.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »